english
nederlands
Indymedia NL
Vrij Media Centrum Nederland
Indymedia NL is een onafhankelijk lokaal en mondiaal vrij communicatie orgaan. Indymedia biedt een andere kijk op het nieuws door een open publicatie methode van tekst, beeld & geluid.
> contact > zoek > archief > hulp > doe mee > publiceer nieuws > open nieuwslijn > disclaimer > chat
Zoek

 
Alle Woorden
Elk Woord
Bevat Media:
Alleen beelden
Alleen video
Alleen audio

Dossiers
Agenda
CHAT!
LINKS

European NewsReal

MDI klaagt Indymedia.nl aan
Rechtszaak Deutsche Bahn tegen Indymedia.nl
Onderwerpen
anti-fascisme / racisme
europa
feminisme
gentechnologie
globalisering
kunst, cultuur en muziek
media
militarisme
natuur, dier en mens
oranje
vrijheid, repressie & mensenrechten
wereldcrisis
wonen/kraken
zonder rubriek
Events
G8
Oaxaca
Schinveld
Schoonmakers-Campagne
Hulp
Hulp en tips voor beginners
Een korte inleiding over Indymedia NL
De spelregels van Indymedia NL
Hoe mee te doen?
Doneer
Steun Indymedia NL financieel!
Rechtszaken kosten veel geld, we kunnen elke (euro)cent gebruiken!

Je kunt ook geld overmaken naar bankrekening 94.32.153 tnv Stichting Vrienden van Indymedia (IBAN: NL41 PSTB 0009 4321 53).
Indymedia Netwerk

www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
kenya
nigeria
south africa

Canada
hamilton
london, ontario
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
burma
jakarta
japan
manila
qc

Europe
alacant
andorra
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
bristol
bulgaria
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris/île-de-france
poland
portugal
romania
russia
scotland
sverige
switzerland
thessaloniki
toulouse
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
chile sur
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
oceania
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
big muddy
binghamton
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
danbury, ct
dc
hampton roads, va
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
idaho
ithaca
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
omaha
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
seattle
tallahassee-red hills
tampa bay
tennessee
united states
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
armenia
beirut
israel
palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
Credits
Deze site is geproduceerd door vrijwilligers met free software waar mogelijk.

De software die we gebruiken is beschikbaar op: mir.indymedia.de
een alternatief is te vinden op: active.org.au/doc

Dank aan indymedia.de en mir-coders voor het creëren en delen van mir!

Contact:
info @ indymedia.nl
Kangaroo Court and nazi England
Charity Sweet - 04.03.2007 22:42

No political dissent please, we're British!

What a tangled web they weave when first they practice to decieve. The antics in courtroom number 3 at Westminster Magistrates Court would be laughable should the consequences of their corruption not be so serious.

Genocide is a war crime and Tony Bliar is a war criminal. The sooner he is sent to the Hague, the better for all humanities children and the future.


What a crock of shit I witnessed yesterday.

Steve Jago was first assigned to Court 2 to resolve two SOCPA charges and Court 3 was reserved for Barbara Tucker and her eleven mysterious charges. Jago was then told from Court 2 to go to Court 4. Sensibly Jago asked court 3 if he could be heard there and was told that's where he was supposed to be. Musical courtrooms anyone?

Tucker was represented by Maggie from Bindman's. Mr. Brian W. Haw was denied access to the public gallery of courtroom 3 which was questioned by Tucker. Next, Haw was denied entry into the gallery with his iconic hat and finally we all settled into the gallery to watch DJ Snow and his three ring circus.

Tucker was first accused off assalting a PC, after climbing over barriers to thump him(sheer unadulterated bullshit) and the charge was mystically reduced to resisting a PC, not resisting arrest. Were the CX Met thug's charms not working on our beloved Babs?

"Can I assalt you now?"
"Can me and my buddies gang assalt you?"

I think any woman with half a mind would wish to resist the antics of these assholes. It's not exactly fun when you are female and attacked by a large number of men for standing peacefully in public. Tucker's main crime appears to be that she will not shut up and she keeps saying, "Stop killing the kids."

Tucker asserted to Snowjob that all the witnesses from the MET would need to attend court and bear witness on the stand as they all had given perjured statements. Tucker asserted this fact on three separate occasions. The CPS said that they could lesson the witness list by withdrawing some statements... anyone smell a big, stinky, dirty political trial?

Maggie explained to Snowjob that the extraordinary bail conditions need not be set as the charge on Tucker had been reduced from assalting an officer to resisting a PC. Snowjob would not budge and continued to list off a string of accusations which he deemed to be offences to which Tucker clearly pointed out that not a single conviction had been achieved. The bail conditions remain, for the moment.

A trial date was set for May and to extend for three days as the court wanted to deal with her case expeditiously? Unless I am mistaken, they have been dragging Tucker through the courts for over a year since she first notified the Commissioner of her intent to peacefully campaign anywhere, anytime, as long as there is government. Sir Blair, or Sir Shite as I refer to him, was complicit in covering up her notification as were the MET in general, the CPS and that dirty filthy excuse for a judge, Mr. void ab initio - Snowjob. He is well aware that this case was and still is bollocks from the beginning.

Maggie handed a letter to the ignorant clerk of the court, (yes he was indeed pig ignorant in his manner) which clearly put forward Tuckers views. A judicial review would be called upon DJ Snow for his complicity in corrupt court proceeding including gross abuse of process. A judicial review would also be required of the CPS for their hand in these dirty courtrooms. And lastly, the MET and Sir Shite needed to be scrutinised in another JR. All these entities have grossly overstepped the mark and exceeded their authority.

Out goes DJ Snow and in pops DJ Evans to deal with the SOCPA charges against Babs. (I don't like the look of this idiot whatsoever.)

DJ Evans stated that he wanted to deal with these cases quickly and the courtroom erupted into laughter.

A pre-trial review was fixed over three days from May 4th until June 1st.

DJ Evans then exited the courtroom. Then he returned 3 minutes later. Then the CPS suggested that he leave again - he left. THE CPS and the clerk started to have a natter.

It's now Jago's turn to take center ring in Tony the Terrorist's circus.

DJ Snow enters the courtroom and denies Tucker entry to the courtroom to be a MacKenzie friend for Jago. He refused to adjourn the case so as Jago could obtain a solicitor of his choice. The case was put back until 1:00pm. He threatened that should Jago leave he would be arrested as he had been bailed to his courtroom. (Seeing is believing) Jago pointed out that he was denied legal aid and also denied a solicitor of his choice and was now being denied his MacKenzie friend. This is justice???

The idea of the clerk asking Jago, "Why are you here?" set the courtroom laughing yet again. The judges were in and out of the courtroom as if there was a revolving door and when no judge was present, the clerk was left holding the bag.

"Why are you here?"

Jago was bailed for what to where for why by whom?

APPARENTLY NO ONE KNEW.

We went out for a smoke, and were summoned back up to the courtroom at 12:00. Steve stood in the door to courtroom 3, leaning against the doorframe and continued to assert his right to a MacKenzie friend of his choice - Tucker. DENIED! Snow threatened to have Jago for contempt of court for leaning. Snow once again exited the courtroom and the clerk took over, yet again.

Haw entered the room as Jago's MacKenzie friend and there was no sign of a judge in the courtroom from that point on.

Can you spell K.A.N.G.A.R.O.O. C.O.U.R.T.?

An extraordinary amount of court security entered the courtroom and the dock. They all had a good laugh at the side show that is Horseshit Road - Westminster Magistrates court.

In the end, the clerk produced a bail sheet without a judge making a decision, and bailed Jago to June 12th on unconditional bail. Jago has been denied legal aid for his SOCPA cases up to date. Oddly, one of Jago's cases that he has been refused legal aid for, includes assaulting a PC which carries the possibility of imprisonment - an imprisonable offence unlike SOCPA, and it has been decided by the European courts that legal aid funding is generally mandatory for all imprisonable offences.

What a steaming pile of shite! Tony's world of political trials must be brought out into the public realm. If the public could have watched a video of yesterday's antics with those bloody bent judges... Tony would be off to the Hague sooner than he could lie with unmistakable ease.

In closing,

"Tony, kiss my ass!"

Sincerely,
Charity Sweet XXX




- E-Mail: charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk
 

Lees meer over: europa Oaxaca

aanvullingen
> indymedia.nl > zoek > archief > hulp > doe mee > publiceer nieuws > open nieuwslijn > disclaimer > chat
DISCLAIMER: Indymedia NL werkt volgens een 'open posting' principe om zodoende de vrijheid van meningsuiting te bevorderen. De berichten (tekst, beelden, audio en video) die gepost zijn in de open nieuwslijn van Indymedia NL behoren toe aan de betreffende auteur. De meningen die naar voren komen in deze berichten worden niet zonder meer door de redactie van Indymedia NL gesteund. Ook is het niet altijd mogelijk voor Indymedia NL om de waarheid van de berichten te garanderen.